Still far better than nothing but we're comparing here. It still requires masking, of sorts, behind certain objects from within its tool. PS added sky replacement to mimic Luminar in its latest release, but it isn't as good. But this is very good for Facebook and Twitter. So none of the photos you made from this will win you any award, since the results are all "fake news". If your photo have trees and leafs it would take you forever. For example in PS (which I never used, but have heard) you need to draw your own mask to replace the sky. If these are the kind of things you need to use all the time, it will be faster than PS. The sky replacement even auto does the white balance for the ground, so the colours will match. Sky replacement are done without the need to manually draw the mask. AI-clarity (name?) gives the effect without the grow. AI-skin can fix freckles and other things. If what he said is true, pretty impressive. I just watched this B&H presentation on Luminar 4
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |